Donor-directed corpus contributions retain capital character despite exemption claims under section 10(23C)(vi), preventing their treatment as taxable...
Enhanced tax-audit threshold applies where banking records establish compliant non-cash receipts and payments, eliminating penalty exposure for audit ...
Transfer pricing consistency protects identical non-interest-bearing debenture terms from a later notional-interest adjustment without valid statutory...
Rectification of debatable deduction claims cannot reverse scrutiny-approved co-operative society interest income deductions as apparent record errors...
Cash-method accounting bars presumptive interest taxation, while unsupported securities and share-trading additions require reliable material and veri...
Declared Service u/s 66 E(e) of FA or not - Business Transfer Agreement (BTA) entered by the Appellant having a non-compete clause - The tribunal held that, Adjudication authority confirmed demand but failed to acknowledge the exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax. Non-compete clause was a routine condition for transferring a running business concern. Terms of the agreement must be read as a whole; non-compete clause cannot be separated to bring the transaction under service tax. - Demand set aside.
Declared Service u/s 66 E(e) of FA or not - Business Transfer Agreement (BTA) entered by the Appellant having a non-compete clause - The tribunal held that, Adjudication authority confirmed demand but failed to acknowledge the exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax. Non-compete clause was a routine condition for transferring a running business concern. Terms of the agreement must be read as a whole; non-compete clause cannot be separated to bring the transaction under service tax. - Demand set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
