Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Addition u/s 68 - Share premium - Transaction in the nature of Capital Account - violation of the provision of Section 78(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 - The High court found in favor of the appellant, stating that the share premium received on the issuance of shares is on capital account and does not constitute income. Even if there were violations of Section 78 of the Companies Act, 1956, it would not turn the share premium amount into a revenue receipt. The Assessing Officers failed to understand the difference between utilization of funds and the creation of share premium account in the books of accounts. - Accordingly, the additions so made by AO deleted.
Addition u/s 68 - Share premium - Transaction in the nature of Capital Account - violation of the provision of Section 78(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 - The High court found in favor of the appellant, stating that the share premium received on the issuance of shares is on capital account and does not constitute income. Even if there were violations of Section 78 of the Companies Act, 1956, it would not turn the share premium amount into a revenue receipt. The Assessing Officers failed to understand the difference between utilization of funds and the creation of share premium account in the books of accounts. - Accordingly, the additions so made by AO deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
