Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Black Money - Beneficial ownership - undisclosed foreign income/asset - The ITAT recognized that the investments were either made by the assessee's son or were explained by loans from banks, and not by the assessee himself. Consequently, it was held that the assessee was not the beneficial owner of the trusts in question and had not made any undisclosed foreign investments. - The held that, the allegation that, because the assessee is a settlor of the trust, he remains principal beneficiary is totally incorrect and devoid of merits, more particularly in the context when other trustee are managing the affairs of the trust and also beneficial owners of trust properties.
Black Money - Beneficial ownership - undisclosed foreign income/asset - The ITAT recognized that the investments were either made by the assessee's son or were explained by loans from banks, and not by the assessee himself. Consequently, it was held that the assessee was not the beneficial owner of the trusts in question and had not made any undisclosed foreign investments. - The held that, the allegation that, because the assessee is a settlor of the trust, he remains principal beneficiary is totally incorrect and devoid of merits, more particularly in the context when other trustee are managing the affairs of the trust and also beneficial owners of trust properties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.