Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Approval granted u/s 10(23C)(iv) revoked - charitable activity u/s 2(15) questioned - The Revenue alleges that the assessee is promoting its own products under the guise of charitable activities. However, the assessee argues that its activities are genuine charitable endeavors aimed at benefiting the target population. - The ITAT held that, the activities of the assessee are in the category of medical relief to the poor. Thus, if we interpret the provisions of section 2(15) of the Act strictly, the proviso would not apply. - The impugned order passed by learned CIT (Exemption) withdrawing the approval granted under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Act is unsustainable.
Approval granted u/s 10(23C)(iv) revoked - charitable activity u/s 2(15) questioned - The Revenue alleges that the assessee is promoting its own products under the guise of charitable activities. However, the assessee argues that its activities are genuine charitable endeavors aimed at benefiting the target population. - The ITAT held that, the activities of the assessee are in the category of medical relief to the poor. Thus, if we interpret the provisions of section 2(15) of the Act strictly, the proviso would not apply. - The impugned order passed by learned CIT (Exemption) withdrawing the approval granted under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Act is unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
