Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Scope of Advance Ruling - Tax payable as RCM under Notification issued u/s 9(3) of GST Act, 2017 - “State Tax due” under SGST Act, 2017 or not? - Rajasthan Investment and Promotion Scheme-2019 (RIPS-2019). - The ruling concluded that the question raised by the applicant was more aligned with the provisions of the RIPS-2019 scheme rather than the GST Act. Therefore, it deemed the application for advance ruling under the GST Act as not maintainable and rejected it accordingly.
Scope of Advance Ruling - Tax payable as RCM under Notification issued u/s 9(3) of GST Act, 2017 - “State Tax due” under SGST Act, 2017 or not? - Rajasthan Investment and Promotion Scheme-2019 (RIPS-2019). - The ruling concluded that the question raised by the applicant was more aligned with the provisions of the RIPS-2019 scheme rather than the GST Act. Therefore, it deemed the application for advance ruling under the GST Act as not maintainable and rejected it accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.