Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Scope of Advance Ruling - Tax payable as RCM under Notification issued u/s 9(3) of GST Act, 2017 - “State Tax due” under SGST Act, 2017 or not? - Rajasthan Investment and Promotion Scheme-2019 (RIPS-2019). - The ruling concluded that the question raised by the applicant was more aligned with the provisions of the RIPS-2019 scheme rather than the GST Act. Therefore, it deemed the application for advance ruling under the GST Act as not maintainable and rejected it accordingly.
Scope of Advance Ruling - Tax payable as RCM under Notification issued u/s 9(3) of GST Act, 2017 - “State Tax due” under SGST Act, 2017 or not? - Rajasthan Investment and Promotion Scheme-2019 (RIPS-2019). - The ruling concluded that the question raised by the applicant was more aligned with the provisions of the RIPS-2019 scheme rather than the GST Act. Therefore, it deemed the application for advance ruling under the GST Act as not maintainable and rejected it accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
