Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of application filed in form no. 10AB for grant of registration u/s 12AB and 80G(5) - The ITAT found that the CIT(E) had grounds for dissatisfaction based on the deficiencies and non-compliances reported by the CAG. However, the material effect of these issues on the Assessee's objectives was not explicitly addressed. The matter was remanded to the CIT(E) for a detailed examination and to provide a reasoned decision on whether these issues affect the Assessee's eligibility for registration under sections 12AB and 80G.
Rejection of application filed in form no. 10AB for grant of registration u/s 12AB and 80G(5) - The ITAT found that the CIT(E) had grounds for dissatisfaction based on the deficiencies and non-compliances reported by the CAG. However, the material effect of these issues on the Assessee's objectives was not explicitly addressed. The matter was remanded to the CIT(E) for a detailed examination and to provide a reasoned decision on whether these issues affect the Assessee's eligibility for registration under sections 12AB and 80G.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.