Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Unaccounted investment u/s. 69C - The ITAT observed that the confusion arose because the assessee had treated the total booking amount (creditors) as closing work in progress, which the AO considered as unexplained investment. - The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in deleting the addition, stating that the amount had already been offered for tax as gross profits.
Unaccounted investment u/s. 69C - The ITAT observed that the confusion arose because the assessee had treated the total booking amount (creditors) as closing work in progress, which the AO considered as unexplained investment. - The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in deleting the addition, stating that the amount had already been offered for tax as gross profits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.