Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Determination of income - The Tribunal agreed with the Ld. CIT(A)'s finding that the assessee, a real estate developer, has consistently followed the Project Completion Method (PCM) for revenue recognition, which was accepted by the department in earlier years. The Tribunal referenced various judicial precedents to assert that the PCM is a recognized method of accounting for real estate developers and that changing the accounting method based on the Guidance Note on Accounting for Real Estate Transactions (Revised 2012) was not justified.
Determination of income - The Tribunal agreed with the Ld. CIT(A)'s finding that the assessee, a real estate developer, has consistently followed the Project Completion Method (PCM) for revenue recognition, which was accepted by the department in earlier years. The Tribunal referenced various judicial precedents to assert that the PCM is a recognized method of accounting for real estate developers and that changing the accounting method based on the Guidance Note on Accounting for Real Estate Transactions (Revised 2012) was not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.