Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Determination of income - The Tribunal agreed with the Ld. CIT(A)'s finding that the assessee, a real estate developer, has consistently followed the Project Completion Method (PCM) for revenue recognition, which was accepted by the department in earlier years. The Tribunal referenced various judicial precedents to assert that the PCM is a recognized method of accounting for real estate developers and that changing the accounting method based on the Guidance Note on Accounting for Real Estate Transactions (Revised 2012) was not justified.
Determination of income - The Tribunal agreed with the Ld. CIT(A)'s finding that the assessee, a real estate developer, has consistently followed the Project Completion Method (PCM) for revenue recognition, which was accepted by the department in earlier years. The Tribunal referenced various judicial precedents to assert that the PCM is a recognized method of accounting for real estate developers and that changing the accounting method based on the Guidance Note on Accounting for Real Estate Transactions (Revised 2012) was not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.