Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Accrual of income in India - PE in India or not? - Agency PE - whether assessee has a business connection in India under Section 9(1)? - The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the business model post-2005 did not create a Permanent Establishment (PE) or an Agency PE in India for Sabre GLBL Inc., as the operations and agreements post-2005 significantly differed from the earlier model. The Tribunal differentiated the current business operations from those evaluated in the case of Galileo International Inc., where a PE was established due to the presence of an intermediary.
Accrual of income in India - PE in India or not? - Agency PE - whether assessee has a business connection in India under Section 9(1)? - The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the business model post-2005 did not create a Permanent Establishment (PE) or an Agency PE in India for Sabre GLBL Inc., as the operations and agreements post-2005 significantly differed from the earlier model. The Tribunal differentiated the current business operations from those evaluated in the case of Galileo International Inc., where a PE was established due to the presence of an intermediary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
