Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A/153C - The tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the imposition of the penalty by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the learned CIT(A). It concludes that the penalty is legitimate under the provisions of Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) of the Act, considering the circumstances of the case and relevant legal interpretations.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A/153C - The tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the imposition of the penalty by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the learned CIT(A). It concludes that the penalty is legitimate under the provisions of Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) of the Act, considering the circumstances of the case and relevant legal interpretations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.