Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Validity of Faceless assessment - procedure contemplated u/s 144B - The petitioner contended that their objections and replies were not considered before passing the assessment order, contrary to the procedures outlined in Section 144B(1)(vii), (xiv), and (xvi)(b) of the Act. The High Court found merit in this argument, noting that the failure to consider the petitioner's responses violated procedural requirements, thereby vitiating the assessment proceedings. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Validity of Faceless assessment - procedure contemplated u/s 144B - The petitioner contended that their objections and replies were not considered before passing the assessment order, contrary to the procedures outlined in Section 144B(1)(vii), (xiv), and (xvi)(b) of the Act. The High Court found merit in this argument, noting that the failure to consider the petitioner's responses violated procedural requirements, thereby vitiating the assessment proceedings. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
