Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of Faceless assessment - procedure contemplated u/s 144B - The petitioner contended that their objections and replies were not considered before passing the assessment order, contrary to the procedures outlined in Section 144B(1)(vii), (xiv), and (xvi)(b) of the Act. The High Court found merit in this argument, noting that the failure to consider the petitioner's responses violated procedural requirements, thereby vitiating the assessment proceedings. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Validity of Faceless assessment - procedure contemplated u/s 144B - The petitioner contended that their objections and replies were not considered before passing the assessment order, contrary to the procedures outlined in Section 144B(1)(vii), (xiv), and (xvi)(b) of the Act. The High Court found merit in this argument, noting that the failure to consider the petitioner's responses violated procedural requirements, thereby vitiating the assessment proceedings. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
