Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being deemed to have been never filed which was picked for processing - Assessee filed 2nd belated return u/s 139(4) - The ITAT held that, since the initial return was invalid, the intimation issued by the CPC based on it was also invalid. The CPC should have considered the second valid return available in the departmental database at the time of processing under section 143(1).
Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being deemed to have been never filed which was picked for processing - Assessee filed 2nd belated return u/s 139(4) - The ITAT held that, since the initial return was invalid, the intimation issued by the CPC based on it was also invalid. The CPC should have considered the second valid return available in the departmental database at the time of processing under section 143(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
