Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening notice issued u/s 148A - not signed either physically or digitally - minimum period of seven days prescribed u/s 148A(b) not provided - - The High court, in its analysis, referred to precedents and held that the notices were indeed invalid due to lack of signature and non-compliance with prescribed time periods. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned notices and orders while reserving liberty for the respondents to initiate proceedings in accordance with the law.
Validity of reopening notice issued u/s 148A - not signed either physically or digitally - minimum period of seven days prescribed u/s 148A(b) not provided - - The High court, in its analysis, referred to precedents and held that the notices were indeed invalid due to lack of signature and non-compliance with prescribed time periods. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned notices and orders while reserving liberty for the respondents to initiate proceedings in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.