Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Validity of reopening notice issued u/s 148A - not signed either physically or digitally - minimum period of seven days prescribed u/s 148A(b) not provided - - The High court, in its analysis, referred to precedents and held that the notices were indeed invalid due to lack of signature and non-compliance with prescribed time periods. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned notices and orders while reserving liberty for the respondents to initiate proceedings in accordance with the law.
Validity of reopening notice issued u/s 148A - not signed either physically or digitally - minimum period of seven days prescribed u/s 148A(b) not provided - - The High court, in its analysis, referred to precedents and held that the notices were indeed invalid due to lack of signature and non-compliance with prescribed time periods. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned notices and orders while reserving liberty for the respondents to initiate proceedings in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.