Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Revival of the Company - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contention that additional documents should be considered for the revival of the company after the lapse of the two-year period specified in Section 420(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal emphasized that the application for additional evidence was filed beyond the permissible period, thus not adhering to the statutory timeline.
Revival of the Company - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contention that additional documents should be considered for the revival of the company after the lapse of the two-year period specified in Section 420(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal emphasized that the application for additional evidence was filed beyond the permissible period, thus not adhering to the statutory timeline.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
