Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revival of the Company - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contention that additional documents should be considered for the revival of the company after the lapse of the two-year period specified in Section 420(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal emphasized that the application for additional evidence was filed beyond the permissible period, thus not adhering to the statutory timeline.
Revival of the Company - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contention that additional documents should be considered for the revival of the company after the lapse of the two-year period specified in Section 420(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal emphasized that the application for additional evidence was filed beyond the permissible period, thus not adhering to the statutory timeline.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
