Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Order u/s 148A(b) as passed against the petitioner in respect of the old PAN card - The Court noted that both the old and the new PAN cards of the petitioner were active, and since the old PAN card was used for transactions in the assessment year 2018-19, and the proceedings related to it were pending, the request for deletion of the old PAN could not be considered. The petitioner had transitioned from the old PAN card to a new one but faced issues due to an assessment order pertaining to the old PAN for unexplained money u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act. The Court directed that if the petitioner files an appeal using the old PAN, it should be processed in accordance with the law.
Order u/s 148A(b) as passed against the petitioner in respect of the old PAN card - The Court noted that both the old and the new PAN cards of the petitioner were active, and since the old PAN card was used for transactions in the assessment year 2018-19, and the proceedings related to it were pending, the request for deletion of the old PAN could not be considered. The petitioner had transitioned from the old PAN card to a new one but faced issues due to an assessment order pertaining to the old PAN for unexplained money u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act. The Court directed that if the petitioner files an appeal using the old PAN, it should be processed in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.