Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - The Tribunal noted that the assessee provided complete details of the share subscribers, their financial capacity, and the transactions were carried out through banking channels, shifting the burden of proof to the Assessing Officer (AO) who failed to conduct an adequate inquiry to disprove the assessee's claims. Therefore, the primary onus placed on the assessee by section 68 was discharged, and the addition made by the AO was not justified.
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - The Tribunal noted that the assessee provided complete details of the share subscribers, their financial capacity, and the transactions were carried out through banking channels, shifting the burden of proof to the Assessing Officer (AO) who failed to conduct an adequate inquiry to disprove the assessee's claims. Therefore, the primary onus placed on the assessee by section 68 was discharged, and the addition made by the AO was not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
