Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Ineligibility for claiming ITC on inward supplies of goods or services used for construction on account of own use - The appellant contested the restriction on ITC for immovable property construction, arguing it should apply only to capitalized expenses. The respondent countered that the restriction applies regardless of capitalization. The Appellate Authority (AAAR) affirmed that the restriction applies to all construction expenses, regardless of capitalization, concluding that ITC for such construction is not available.
Ineligibility for claiming ITC on inward supplies of goods or services used for construction on account of own use - The appellant contested the restriction on ITC for immovable property construction, arguing it should apply only to capitalized expenses. The respondent countered that the restriction applies regardless of capitalization. The Appellate Authority (AAAR) affirmed that the restriction applies to all construction expenses, regardless of capitalization, concluding that ITC for such construction is not available.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.