Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Additions u/s 69B - Validity of assessment order - Accepting the writ petition over alternative appellate remedy, the High Court held that, the proceedings leading up to the impugned order lacked clarity, as the appellant was led to believe that its explanations regarding the alleged excess stock had been accepted, except for a specific amount. Consequently, the appellant did not further explain the source of purchase of the excess stock, resulting in a violation of principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the matter restored back for re-adjudication.
Additions u/s 69B - Validity of assessment order - Accepting the writ petition over alternative appellate remedy, the High Court held that, the proceedings leading up to the impugned order lacked clarity, as the appellant was led to believe that its explanations regarding the alleged excess stock had been accepted, except for a specific amount. Consequently, the appellant did not further explain the source of purchase of the excess stock, resulting in a violation of principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the matter restored back for re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.