Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
AO suo-moto framed the order u/s. 154 and rectified the order - AO framed order u/s. 154 of the Act without affording a reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, also without being directed by CIT(A) - The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, stating that the AO assumed powers conferred upon him by section 154 of the Act without affording any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.
AO suo-moto framed the order u/s. 154 and rectified the order - AO framed order u/s. 154 of the Act without affording a reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, also without being directed by CIT(A) - The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, stating that the AO assumed powers conferred upon him by section 154 of the Act without affording any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.