Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
AO suo-moto framed the order u/s. 154 and rectified the order - AO framed order u/s. 154 of the Act without affording a reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, also without being directed by CIT(A) - The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, stating that the AO assumed powers conferred upon him by section 154 of the Act without affording any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.
AO suo-moto framed the order u/s. 154 and rectified the order - AO framed order u/s. 154 of the Act without affording a reasonable and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, also without being directed by CIT(A) - The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, stating that the AO assumed powers conferred upon him by section 154 of the Act without affording any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
