Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Assessment u/s 153A - unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Abated assessment or not - The ITAT observed that, To recapitulate the facts of this case, original return was filed u/s 139(1) of the Act on 28.10.2009, this means that notice u/s 143(2) of the Act could be issued up to 30.09.2010 (i.e. six months from the end of the financial year in which return was filed i.e. 2009-10). The search in this case was conducted on 14.09.2010. - Accordingly, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, stating that the assessment for the relevant year cannot be treated as abated or pending on the date of the search.
Assessment u/s 153A - unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Abated assessment or not - The ITAT observed that, To recapitulate the facts of this case, original return was filed u/s 139(1) of the Act on 28.10.2009, this means that notice u/s 143(2) of the Act could be issued up to 30.09.2010 (i.e. six months from the end of the financial year in which return was filed i.e. 2009-10). The search in this case was conducted on 14.09.2010. - Accordingly, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, stating that the assessment for the relevant year cannot be treated as abated or pending on the date of the search.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.