Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Profiteering - supply of “Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films”. - The Commission concluded that there was no 'Exception Category' of tickets, and the term was coined by the DGAP. The Respondent had sold 'Exception Category' cinema tickets only after 23.08.2019, charging GST @ 18%, and no benefit of tax reduction was required to be passed on to these tickets. - The Commission further noted that the Respondent increased the base prices of 'Exception' category tickets after about 6 months from 23.08.2019, after passing on the benefit of tax reduction. This increase in base prices did not attract the Anti-Profiteering Provisions.
Profiteering - supply of “Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films”. - The Commission concluded that there was no 'Exception Category' of tickets, and the term was coined by the DGAP. The Respondent had sold 'Exception Category' cinema tickets only after 23.08.2019, charging GST @ 18%, and no benefit of tax reduction was required to be passed on to these tickets. - The Commission further noted that the Respondent increased the base prices of 'Exception' category tickets after about 6 months from 23.08.2019, after passing on the benefit of tax reduction. This increase in base prices did not attract the Anti-Profiteering Provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.