Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Additions u/sec 68 in respect of sale of shares and u/sec 69 in respect of estimated commission expenditure - The Tribunal, relying upon the judicial precedents, found that the appellant had substantiated the genuineness of the purchase and sale of shares through banking channels and documentation. The lack of independent inquiry or substantive evidence from the AO to refute the appellant's claims led to the decision to delete the additions made under sections 68 and 69C, thereby allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.
Additions u/sec 68 in respect of sale of shares and u/sec 69 in respect of estimated commission expenditure - The Tribunal, relying upon the judicial precedents, found that the appellant had substantiated the genuineness of the purchase and sale of shares through banking channels and documentation. The lack of independent inquiry or substantive evidence from the AO to refute the appellant's claims led to the decision to delete the additions made under sections 68 and 69C, thereby allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
