Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery of CENVAT Credit alongwith interest and penalty - input or not - pre-fabricated building green house shelter - used for providing the output service - The Tribunal examined the characteristics of the pre-fabricated shelters and concluded that their attachment to the earth was for stability and functionality rather than permanent annexation. - Relying on the precedents and legal analysis, the Tribunal determined that the shelters qualified as capital goods and were eligible for Cenvat credit. CESTAT rejected the Department's argument that the shelters became immovable property due to their attachment to the ground.
Recovery of CENVAT Credit alongwith interest and penalty - input or not - pre-fabricated building green house shelter - used for providing the output service - The Tribunal examined the characteristics of the pre-fabricated shelters and concluded that their attachment to the earth was for stability and functionality rather than permanent annexation. - Relying on the precedents and legal analysis, the Tribunal determined that the shelters qualified as capital goods and were eligible for Cenvat credit. CESTAT rejected the Department's argument that the shelters became immovable property due to their attachment to the ground.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.