Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Demand against Retention of the service tax collected on behalf of the principal by the petitioner/assessee - The High court found that the appellant had indeed remitted the entire amount of service tax collected either to the principal or directly to the Department. - The High court concluded that the Tribunal's finding regarding the retention of service tax was unsustainable, as it was contrary to the admitted factual backdrop of the case. Consequently, the demand raised against the appellant set aside.
Demand against Retention of the service tax collected on behalf of the principal by the petitioner/assessee - The High court found that the appellant had indeed remitted the entire amount of service tax collected either to the principal or directly to the Department. - The High court concluded that the Tribunal's finding regarding the retention of service tax was unsustainable, as it was contrary to the admitted factual backdrop of the case. Consequently, the demand raised against the appellant set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
