Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Validity of demand of GST and denial of input tax credit (ITC) - The High Court held that, u/s 16 of the TNGST Act read with Rule 36 of the rules framed thereunder, the registered person is under an obligation to establish purchase, including receipt of goods or services, as the case may be - Ordinarily, the petitioner would be required to produce invoices, e-way bills, payment receipts, lorry receipts, delivery challans and the like to establish purchase and receipt of goods. Since the impugned order was issued primarily on the basis that such documents were not submitted by the petitioner, it is not appropriate to adjudicate this issue in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction when the petitioner has an alternative remedy.
Validity of demand of GST and denial of input tax credit (ITC) - The High Court held that, u/s 16 of the TNGST Act read with Rule 36 of the rules framed thereunder, the registered person is under an obligation to establish purchase, including receipt of goods or services, as the case may be - Ordinarily, the petitioner would be required to produce invoices, e-way bills, payment receipts, lorry receipts, delivery challans and the like to establish purchase and receipt of goods. Since the impugned order was issued primarily on the basis that such documents were not submitted by the petitioner, it is not appropriate to adjudicate this issue in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction when the petitioner has an alternative remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
