Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Reversal of refund earlier granted to the petitioner - not affording any opportunity of hearing - Violation of provisions of section 75(4) of GST - Considering the fair statement made by the Revenue's counsel, the High court refrains from imposing costs despite the conduct of the revenue authorities. - Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, setting aside the order. The matter is remitted to the respondent to issue a fresh order after affording the petitioner an opportunity for a hearing.
Reversal of refund earlier granted to the petitioner - not affording any opportunity of hearing - Violation of provisions of section 75(4) of GST - Considering the fair statement made by the Revenue's counsel, the High court refrains from imposing costs despite the conduct of the revenue authorities. - Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, setting aside the order. The matter is remitted to the respondent to issue a fresh order after affording the petitioner an opportunity for a hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.