Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Reversal of refund earlier granted to the petitioner - not affording any opportunity of hearing - Violation of provisions of section 75(4) of GST - Considering the fair statement made by the Revenue's counsel, the High court refrains from imposing costs despite the conduct of the revenue authorities. - Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, setting aside the order. The matter is remitted to the respondent to issue a fresh order after affording the petitioner an opportunity for a hearing.
Reversal of refund earlier granted to the petitioner - not affording any opportunity of hearing - Violation of provisions of section 75(4) of GST - Considering the fair statement made by the Revenue's counsel, the High court refrains from imposing costs despite the conduct of the revenue authorities. - Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, setting aside the order. The matter is remitted to the respondent to issue a fresh order after affording the petitioner an opportunity for a hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.