Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Revision u/s 263 - Reopening of assessment - AO completed the assessment on declared income of the assessee - The Tribunal held that, the AO raised the issue, asked for the details and applied his mind while passing the assessment order. Even in the proceeding u/s. 263 the ld. PCIT did not bring anything on record that how the order of the ld. AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue what material he relied. - The ITAT observed that, PCIT merely aims to make inquiry as per his will and wishes which could have been done at the time of assessment proceeding as per the supervisor power vested and for that again and again same exercise cannot be done on the assessee. - Revision order quashed.
Revision u/s 263 - Reopening of assessment - AO completed the assessment on declared income of the assessee - The Tribunal held that, the AO raised the issue, asked for the details and applied his mind while passing the assessment order. Even in the proceeding u/s. 263 the ld. PCIT did not bring anything on record that how the order of the ld. AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue what material he relied. - The ITAT observed that, PCIT merely aims to make inquiry as per his will and wishes which could have been done at the time of assessment proceeding as per the supervisor power vested and for that again and again same exercise cannot be done on the assessee. - Revision order quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
