Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for violations of Sections 269SS and 269T are not applicable when the existence of the transactions (cash loans taken and repaid) is itself disputed. Furthermore, it highlighted the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine evidence used against the assessee.
Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for violations of Sections 269SS and 269T are not applicable when the existence of the transactions (cash loans taken and repaid) is itself disputed. Furthermore, it highlighted the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine evidence used against the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
