Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Addition u/s 56(2)(x) - sale of flats - difference between the value taken by the assessee and the fair market value (FMV) u/s 50C - The ITAT found that the value adopted by the assessee and the FMV of the flats under Section 50C were within the range of ±10%, thus the provisions of Section 56(2)(x) did not apply. - Following the earlier decisions, the Tribunal deleted the additions.
Addition u/s 56(2)(x) - sale of flats - difference between the value taken by the assessee and the fair market value (FMV) u/s 50C - The ITAT found that the value adopted by the assessee and the FMV of the flats under Section 50C were within the range of ±10%, thus the provisions of Section 56(2)(x) did not apply. - Following the earlier decisions, the Tribunal deleted the additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
