Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Jurisdiction of CIT (A) while passing an order in appeal u/s 250 - Validity of assessment framed without issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - whether CIT (A) has exceeded his jurisdiction by directing the Ld. AO to proceed in terms of section 150 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and reframe assessment order as per law and after complying with the prescribed procedure? - The ITAT held that, the CIT(A) has set aside the assessment the power which he does not have, therefore, the order of the CIT(A) to this extent is bad in law as the CIT(A) has exceeded his jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction of CIT (A) while passing an order in appeal u/s 250 - Validity of assessment framed without issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - whether CIT (A) has exceeded his jurisdiction by directing the Ld. AO to proceed in terms of section 150 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and reframe assessment order as per law and after complying with the prescribed procedure? - The ITAT held that, the CIT(A) has set aside the assessment the power which he does not have, therefore, the order of the CIT(A) to this extent is bad in law as the CIT(A) has exceeded his jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
