Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Detention of goods in transit quashed where required transport documents were available and detention lacked legal basis.
    Substantial compliance with bid payment condition defeats cancellation where third-party deposit was received and undisputed.
    General penalty cannot be levied where GST late fee already applies; High Court upheld the late fee and struck the residual penalty.
    Essential character test places brake hoses under vulcanised rubber heading despite automotive use and fittings.
    Limitation for reassessment notice: adjournment time under section 148A(b) excluded, and deemed reply date upheld.
    Section 54F deduction for under-construction flat upheld despite delayed registration after substantial timely payment.
    Arm's length remuneration bars further profit attribution to a dependent agent PE, while refund interest requires factual verification.
    Treaty-exempt capital gains cannot absorb share-sale losses; carry forward of long-term capital loss must be recomputed.
    Cost of improvement and section 54 relief upheld for habitable flat works, multiple homes, and capital gains deposit.
    Fair market value as on 01.04.1981 cannot be reduced through valuation reference when supported by a registered valuer's report.
    Unified peak credit applies to seized cash ledgers; reassessment and use of third-party seized material were upheld.
    Transfer pricing penalty under section 271G fails when the underlying adjustment is deleted and the foundation disappears.
    Transfer pricing on intra-group services cannot be benchmarked at nil without prescribed comparables, the Tribunal holds.
    TDS on leave travel concession payments cannot trigger default liability where subsisting court directions barred deduction.
    Prospective operation of section 115BBE bars enhanced tax rate on surrendered income from a pre-amendment survey.
    Political donation deduction and unexplained bank deposit claims fail where records and disclosed income support the assessee's explanation.
    Partners' capital contribution addition deleted; unsecured loan issue remanded for verification of bank entries and repayment evidence.
    Scrutiny notice validity, rent disallowance, bogus purchases and related-party salary additions were narrowed or deleted on Tribunal review.
    Leave encashment exemption under revised ceiling applied for non-Government employees, with recomputation directed on remand.
    Exemption notification disputes on Special Additional Duty were held to lie only in the Supreme Court, not the High Court.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Addition u/s 69B r.w.s.115BBE - unexplained investment - higher...

Tribunal Rules on Burden of Proof for Unexplained Investments Under Tax Sections 69B and 115BBE.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax February 7, 2024 Case Laws AT
Addition u/s 69B r.w.s.115BBE - unexplained investment - higher rate of tax - amount offered during survey - The ITAT held that the assessee has submitted the details of outflow of funds, the onus is clearly on the Assessing officer to discharge this burden and record a specific finding in this regard and once the same is done, the onus can be shifted to the assessee to explain the nature and source of such investment. - The Tribunal further held that, the statement of the partner of the assessee firm recorded u/s 131 during the course of survey and subsequent affirmation thereof by the assessee by way of surrender letter on a standalone basis and without any corroborative evidence doesn’t fulfill the statutory mandate of deeming provisions. - The income has been rightly offered to tax by the assessee.

Topics

Acts Income Tax