Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Jurisdiction - power of Sales Tax Officer u/s 67 of the VAT Act to seize the books of accounts - The Calcutta High Court held that, since the Sales Tax Officer, who seized the books of accounts, does not lack power or jurisdiction to seize under Section 67 of the VAT Act, therefore, learned Single Judge has committed a manifest error or law to quash the seizure of books of accounts, etc. of the petitioner.
Jurisdiction - power of Sales Tax Officer u/s 67 of the VAT Act to seize the books of accounts - The Calcutta High Court held that, since the Sales Tax Officer, who seized the books of accounts, does not lack power or jurisdiction to seize under Section 67 of the VAT Act, therefore, learned Single Judge has committed a manifest error or law to quash the seizure of books of accounts, etc. of the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.