Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Allowable expenditure versus Application of Income (Repayment of loan) - Payment made to the Marketing Board - progressive payments given to the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board from the year 2006 onwards till the year 2009 - payment of liability of old loan - The High court found that the payment made was for the achievement of the objectives prescribed under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. Therefore, it should not be considered as a repayment of a loan, and the disallowance made was based on incorrect reasoning.
Allowable expenditure versus Application of Income (Repayment of loan) - Payment made to the Marketing Board - progressive payments given to the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board from the year 2006 onwards till the year 2009 - payment of liability of old loan - The High court found that the payment made was for the achievement of the objectives prescribed under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. Therefore, it should not be considered as a repayment of a loan, and the disallowance made was based on incorrect reasoning.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
