Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding as independent of the assessment proceeding - absence of satisfaction recorded in the reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s. 144B - The tribunal, following the Judgement of Supreme Court, confirmed the order of CIT(A) for deleting the penalty on account of no satisfaction recorded by the Ld. AO in the reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B.
Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding as independent of the assessment proceeding - absence of satisfaction recorded in the reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s. 144B - The tribunal, following the Judgement of Supreme Court, confirmed the order of CIT(A) for deleting the penalty on account of no satisfaction recorded by the Ld. AO in the reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.