Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Non acceptance of fresh evidence submitted u/r 46A of the I. T. Rules by CIT(A) - Tribunal noted that, it is possible that in the transition, the ld.CIT(A)[NFAC] had not received copies of the additional evidence filed by assessee. - Consequently, the Tribunal held that, as the Faceless Appeal was a new concept to CIT(A) as well as Assessee, the error which has crept is a possible human error and restored the matter to ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication.
Non acceptance of fresh evidence submitted u/r 46A of the I. T. Rules by CIT(A) - Tribunal noted that, it is possible that in the transition, the ld.CIT(A)[NFAC] had not received copies of the additional evidence filed by assessee. - Consequently, the Tribunal held that, as the Faceless Appeal was a new concept to CIT(A) as well as Assessee, the error which has crept is a possible human error and restored the matter to ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
