Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Non acceptance of fresh evidence submitted u/r 46A of the I. T. Rules by CIT(A) - Tribunal noted that, it is possible that in the transition, the ld.CIT(A)[NFAC] had not received copies of the additional evidence filed by assessee. - Consequently, the Tribunal held that, as the Faceless Appeal was a new concept to CIT(A) as well as Assessee, the error which has crept is a possible human error and restored the matter to ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication.
Non acceptance of fresh evidence submitted u/r 46A of the I. T. Rules by CIT(A) - Tribunal noted that, it is possible that in the transition, the ld.CIT(A)[NFAC] had not received copies of the additional evidence filed by assessee. - Consequently, the Tribunal held that, as the Faceless Appeal was a new concept to CIT(A) as well as Assessee, the error which has crept is a possible human error and restored the matter to ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
