Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Input Tax Credit - Reversal / refunding of ITC - the Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) was not paid and ‘NIL’ return had been filed by the seller but the petitioners had availed of input tax credit - The High court noted discrepancies in the handling of the case by the authorities, particularly the failure to proceed against the seller before reversing the petitioners' input tax credit. HC emphasized the established legal principle that the buyer cannot be burdened with refunding the input tax credit without the authorities first taking action against the seller, except under exceptional circumstances.
Input Tax Credit - Reversal / refunding of ITC - the Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) was not paid and ‘NIL’ return had been filed by the seller but the petitioners had availed of input tax credit - The High court noted discrepancies in the handling of the case by the authorities, particularly the failure to proceed against the seller before reversing the petitioners' input tax credit. HC emphasized the established legal principle that the buyer cannot be burdened with refunding the input tax credit without the authorities first taking action against the seller, except under exceptional circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
