Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Foreign Tax Credit u/s 90/90A - - The Tribunal found that while the DTAA does not prescribe a filing requirement for FTC, the Income Tax Rules (Rule 128) do mandate the filing of Form No. 67 within a specified time limit. It emphasized that the purpose of this requirement is to verify the eligibility, genuineness, and correctness of the FTC claim. - The ITAT concluded that the filing of the claim form along with certificates and statements is mandatory concerning the essence of the FTC claim but directory regarding the time limit. It held that belated compliance does not warrant rejection or denial of the claim.
Foreign Tax Credit u/s 90/90A - - The Tribunal found that while the DTAA does not prescribe a filing requirement for FTC, the Income Tax Rules (Rule 128) do mandate the filing of Form No. 67 within a specified time limit. It emphasized that the purpose of this requirement is to verify the eligibility, genuineness, and correctness of the FTC claim. - The ITAT concluded that the filing of the claim form along with certificates and statements is mandatory concerning the essence of the FTC claim but directory regarding the time limit. It held that belated compliance does not warrant rejection or denial of the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.