Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 1, 2024Case LawsSC
CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ordered - The Supreme Court's decision in this case clarifies that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC does not extend to the directors or officers of a company under moratorium. The Court set aside the National Commission's orders, which had held that a decree cannot be executed against a company due to the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC and, consequently, against certain individuals. The Court remitted the execution application to the National Commission, allowing proceedings against the individual respondents (directors/ officers) for execution, subject to their liability to comply with the order passed against the company.
CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ordered - The Supreme Court's decision in this case clarifies that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC does not extend to the directors or officers of a company under moratorium. The Court set aside the National Commission's orders, which had held that a decree cannot be executed against a company due to the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC and, consequently, against certain individuals. The Court remitted the execution application to the National Commission, allowing proceedings against the individual respondents (directors/ officers) for execution, subject to their liability to comply with the order passed against the company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
