Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 1, 2024Case LawsSC
CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ordered - The Supreme Court's decision in this case clarifies that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC does not extend to the directors or officers of a company under moratorium. The Court set aside the National Commission's orders, which had held that a decree cannot be executed against a company due to the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC and, consequently, against certain individuals. The Court remitted the execution application to the National Commission, allowing proceedings against the individual respondents (directors/ officers) for execution, subject to their liability to comply with the order passed against the company.
CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ordered - The Supreme Court's decision in this case clarifies that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC does not extend to the directors or officers of a company under moratorium. The Court set aside the National Commission's orders, which had held that a decree cannot be executed against a company due to the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC and, consequently, against certain individuals. The Court remitted the execution application to the National Commission, allowing proceedings against the individual respondents (directors/ officers) for execution, subject to their liability to comply with the order passed against the company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.