Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Reopening of assessment u/s 148 - period of limitation - High Court [2022 (11) TMI 1443 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] has quashed the notice and assessment order once it is found that, impugned notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued to the petitioner on 01.04.2021 i.e. after expiry of limitation on 31.03.2021 - Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.
Reopening of assessment u/s 148 - period of limitation - High Court [2022 (11) TMI 1443 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] has quashed the notice and assessment order once it is found that, impugned notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued to the petitioner on 01.04.2021 i.e. after expiry of limitation on 31.03.2021 - Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.