Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 31, 2024Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Date of default - Existence of restructuring proposals - NCLT admitted the application u/s 7 - The Tribunal found that the restructuring proposals dated 21.02.2020 and 29.09.2020 were not binding as they were not effectively implemented due to non-fulfillment of pre-implementation conditions by the Corporate Debtor. - It was also held that unilateral conditions imposed by the Appellant in their payments could not be construed as a revival or extension of the restructuring approvals.
Initiation of CIRP - Date of default - Existence of restructuring proposals - NCLT admitted the application u/s 7 - The Tribunal found that the restructuring proposals dated 21.02.2020 and 29.09.2020 were not binding as they were not effectively implemented due to non-fulfillment of pre-implementation conditions by the Corporate Debtor. - It was also held that unilateral conditions imposed by the Appellant in their payments could not be construed as a revival or extension of the restructuring approvals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
