Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 31, 2024Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Date of default - Existence of restructuring proposals - NCLT admitted the application u/s 7 - The Tribunal found that the restructuring proposals dated 21.02.2020 and 29.09.2020 were not binding as they were not effectively implemented due to non-fulfillment of pre-implementation conditions by the Corporate Debtor. - It was also held that unilateral conditions imposed by the Appellant in their payments could not be construed as a revival or extension of the restructuring approvals.
Initiation of CIRP - Date of default - Existence of restructuring proposals - NCLT admitted the application u/s 7 - The Tribunal found that the restructuring proposals dated 21.02.2020 and 29.09.2020 were not binding as they were not effectively implemented due to non-fulfillment of pre-implementation conditions by the Corporate Debtor. - It was also held that unilateral conditions imposed by the Appellant in their payments could not be construed as a revival or extension of the restructuring approvals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
